1. 643 entries with the Czech word in first position (in several cases, lexemes from a different register occur, most often from Slavic languages), followed by Lithuanian equivalents, grammatical notes, examples of use, and often etymological interpretation;
2. 4 entries without an explanatory article;
3. 54 entries indicating relating terms which were separated based on semantics and listed at the introduction of The Dictionary under the title Relationships attached (at fol. 2v) to entries under the letter A.

1. Czech (or other) expression in first position;
2. a foreign language expression, explanatory entry (except for 4 entries without explanatory articles), optionally a reference to another article;
3. classification into respective categories (each article of the dictionary may fall under more than one category)

1. Filters by categories;
2. Search: contains a) the option of searching by the word in first position only, b) the option of searching in the full extent of the dictionary.

1. General information
2. Parts of speech
3. Topic
4. Etymological legitimacy

1. German-Written Text Marks articles which contain text written in German
2. Non-Czech Word in First Position Marks articles which contain a non-Czech word in first position
3. Text From Another Language (in article) Marks articles which contain text in another language (other than Czech, Lithuanian, or German). Most often, this is Latin, Polish, Greek, or Latvian.
4. Red Lettering Articles, which contain text underlined in red in the original (highlighted red in the transcript).
5. Sentence in Entry Articles, which contain a phrase, a saying, or a proverb, etc.
6. Entry Without Article Entries which do not contain an explanatory article.

1. Noun
2. Adjective
3. Pronoun
4. Numeral
5. Verb
6. Adverb
7. Preposition
8. Conjunction
9. Particle
10. Interjection
11. Collocation, clause, phrase, etc.

1. Theonyms
2. Mythonyms
3. Phytonyms
4. Zoonyms

It is important to note here, that the sorting in this category is largely of orientational nature. It is not a thorough etymological analysis of touched upon articles and it is not meant to offer a decisive critical standpoint.

The purpose is to create an orientational overview of the nature of the relic and outlining the problematic of the relevancy of this work from the point of view of contemporary knowledge.

The categories in this are meant to serve first and foremost as a tool for eventual further critical research.

The sorting of articles into categories within this area takes place in accordance with the dominant interpretation in other etymological works.

1. Lietuvių kalbos etimologinio žodyno duomenų bazė [online]. Vilniaus universiteto Filologijos fakultetas. Dostupné z: http://etimologija.baltnexus.lt/
2. MACHEK 1957: MACHEK, Václav. Etymologický slovník jazyka českého a slovenského. Praha: ČSAV, 1957.
3. SMOCZYŃSKI 2007: SMOCZYŃSKI, Wojciech. Lietuvių kalbos etimologinis žodynas. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas, filologijos fakultetas, 2007.

1. Proof of Slavic Reciprocity Marks articles which are clearly conceptually motivated with regard to documentation of Balto-Slavic unity under the influence of national revivalism.
2. Etymological legitimacy (likely yes) Marks articles in which it is possible to agree with the legitimacy of such a statement based on prevailing interpretations.
3. Etymological legitimacy (likely not) Marks articles in which it is possible to express a disagreeing stand with the legitimacy of such a statement based on prevailing interpretations.
4. Indo-European Origin (likely) Marks articles in which it is possible to agree with the legitimacy of such a statement based on prevailing interpretations.
5. Balto-Slavic Origin (likely) Marks articles in which it is possible to agree with the legitimacy of such a statement based on prevailing interpretations.
6. Slavism Marks articles in which it is possible to agree with the legitimacy of such a statement based on prevailing interpretations.